Author name: Studio Gaeta International

non-resident taxpayers
Italian Residency, Wealth Planning

Italian-source income and non-resident taxpayers: how to determine where your tax is due

A widespread misconception leads many foreign taxpayers to assume that, because they live abroad — or because a Double Tax Convention allocates taxing rights to their State of residence — no Italian obligation can arise on income deriving from Italy. The assumption is unfounded, and the assessments issued by the Italian Revenue Agency (Agenzia delle Entrate) in these cases carry significant financial consequences. This note sets out the sequence of questions a non-resident should work through in order to establish where tax on Italian-source income is actually due, and what has to be filed. Step 1 — Confirm your residence status under the reformed rules The threshold question is not where the income arose, but where the recipient is tax resident. Residents of Italy are taxed on their worldwide income under Art. 3 TUIR; non-residents are taxed only on income considered produced in Italy. Legislative Decree 209/2023 rewrote Art. 2(2) TUIR with effect from the 2024 tax period. Under the current text, an individual is resident in Italy if, for the greater part of the tax period — counting fractions of days — any one of the following alternative criteria is met: residence in Italy within the meaning of the Civil Code (habitual abode); domicile in Italy, now defined for tax purposes as the place where the person’s personal and family relations principally develop — a definition that departs from the previous reference to the Civil Code and gives precedence to personal over economic ties; physical presence in Italy. Registration with the register of resident population (anagrafe della popolazione residente) for the greater part of the tax period no longer operates as a conclusive presumption: following the reform it is a rebuttable presumption, and the taxpayer may prove that the formal record does not reflect the factual position. The Revenue Agency issued operating instructions on these criteria in Circular no. 20/E of 4 November 2024. The exercise matters: if any criterion is met, Italy taxes worldwide income, and the analysis that follows does not apply. Step 2 — Identify which income is considered produced in Italy For non-residents, the taxable perimeter is set by Art. 23 TUIR. Under paragraph 1, the following are considered produced in Italy: income from immovable property (redditi fondiari) situated in Italy; investment income paid by the Italian State, by persons resident in Italy, or by Italian permanent establishments of non-residents — expressly excluding interest and other proceeds from bank and postal deposits and current accounts; employment income for work performed in Italy, including the assimilated income referred to in Art. 50(1)(a) and (b) TUIR; self-employment income from activities carried out in Italy; business income from activities carried out in Italy through a permanent establishment; certain other income (redditi diversi) arising from activities carried out, or assets located, in Italy. Paragraph 2 adds a separate category, taxable irrespective of where the underlying activity was performed, provided the payer is the Italian State, an Italian resident, or an Italian permanent establishment of a non-resident. This covers pensions and assimilated allowances, severance indemnities, various forms of assimilated employment income, consideration for the use of intellectual property, patents and trademarks and for industrial, commercial or scientific know-how, and fees paid to non-resident undertakings for artistic or professional services rendered in Italy. A further rule, at Art. 23(1-bis), treats as Italian-source the capital gain on the disposal of shareholdings in non-resident companies whose value derives, for more than half, directly or indirectly, from immovable property situated in Italy at any point in the preceding 365 days, unless the securities are traded on a regulated market. Article 23 lays down the general domestic source rules applicable to non-residents. Income that falls outside it is not taxable in Italy in the hands of a non-resident. Step 3 — Apply the relevant Double Tax Convention Where a Convention is in force between Italy and the State of residence, it allocates taxing rights between the two States and provides the mechanism for relieving double taxation. Its operation is superimposed on Italian domestic law: depending on the category of income, a treaty may reserve taxation to one State alone, or permit concurrent taxation while capping the rate applicable in the source State. Because rates and allocation rules differ from treaty to treaty, the applicable Convention must be consulted in each case; no general rate can be assumed. Access to treaty benefits is documentary. The Revenue Agency approved standard forms by Provvedimento of 10 July 2013 (prot. 2013/84404): Forms A, B, C and D for refunds, exemption from Italian tax, or application of a reduced rate under a Convention, and Forms E and F for the Parent-Subsidiary and Interest and Royalties Directives respectively. The forms require certification of residence by the foreign tax authority, valid from the date of issue until the end of the tax period indicated. One practical point is frequently misunderstood. Where the required documentation is produced, the withholding agent may apply the treaty benefit directly at source, assuming responsibility for its correct application. If no request supported by proper documentation is submitted, the withholding agent will apply the full domestic rate, and recovery then depends on the refund procedure described below. Step 4 — Establish whether an Italian return must be filed Italian law generally requires anyone in receipt of income produced in Italy, including a person resident abroad, to declare it, subject to the exemptions expressly provided. Non-residents use the same Modello Redditi PF as residents; the instructions for non-residents are contained in Fascicoli 1 and 2, with the general exemption cases set out in Fascicolo 1. Certain income is in no case to be declared, and its receipt by a non-resident therefore generates no Italian filing obligation at all. This includes investment income for which, in relation to non-residents, domestic law or the applicable Convention provides for exemption, for a final withholding tax, or for a substitute tax. Filing may also be advisable where it is not compulsory — for instance to claim deductions or allowances not otherwise granted,

Italy VAT Refund
Vat, Wealth Planning

Italy VAT Refund 2026: New Rules for Non-EU Travelers

From 1 July 2026, Italy introduces important changes to its VAT refund (Tax-Free Shopping) system for travellers who reside outside the European Union. The new legislation simplifies customs procedures by allowing a single validation of all electronic tax-free invoices issued to the same traveller, even when different refund operators are involved, provided they participate in the new system. Another significant change is the extension of the deadline for returning customs-validated invoices to retailers, increasing it from four to six months for eligible purchases. These measures are designed to streamline the refund process, reduce administrative burdens and strengthen Italy’s attractiveness as a destination for international shoppers, investors and business travellers. For a detailed explanation of the new rules and their practical implications, read the full article published by We Wealth. Read the full article on We Wealth

Investor Visa
Family Office, Italian Residency

Italy Investor Visa: Starting with the Nulla Osta

Investor Visa for Italy: a strategic gateway for international investors Italy is increasingly attracting international investors seeking a stable European base for business, wealth planning, and long-term residency. The Investor Visa programme offers a streamlined pathway for non-EU individuals, combining a fully digital application process with attractive investment opportunities. In our latest article for We Wealth, we explore the key requirements, the central role of the nulla osta, and the advantages of integrating the visa with Italy’s neo-resident tax regime. Read the full article on We Wealth Paolo Gaeta Chiara Pascale  Paolo Gaeta & Associati

international wealth
Family Office, Wealth Planning

New EU rules for vulnerable adults and international wealth

As European families and wealth structures become increasingly international, the protection of vulnerable adults is emerging as a key legal and governance issue. The new EU Regulation introduces a harmonised framework for the recognition of protective measures and powers of representation across Member States, reducing legal uncertainty and facilitating the management of cross-border assets. The reform is expected to play a significant role in the future of wealth planning, family governance and international asset protection. Read the full article on We Wealth:  Read the full article Paolo Gaeta Chiara Pascale Paolo Gaeta & Associati

Italian Residency
Family Office, Italian Residency

Italy 2026: Why Global Wealth Is Choosing Italian Residency

A strategic guide to the €300,000 flat tax regime, luxury real estate and wealth structuring for international UHNWIs. Executive Summary Italy is projected to be one of the world’s leading beneficiaries of millionaire migration in 2026.From January 1, the flat tax for new residents rose to €300,000 — yet Italy remains one of Europe’smost competitive jurisdictions for international UHNWIs. This guide analyzes the new regime, the luxury real estate context, and the structural decisionsthat determine whether a relocation succeeds or fails. Introduction: A Silent Reallocation of Global Wealth A quiet but profound transformation is underway in the world of large private fortunes. According toHenley & Partners, 2026 is projected to deliver the largest migration of wealth on record, with as manyas 165,000 millionaires expected to relocate internationally, up from 142,000 in 2025 and 134,000 in 2024. This is no longer a marginal phenomenon. It has become the defining mechanism through which capital,talent and entrepreneurial opportunity are being reallocated among jurisdictions. For families with substantial international wealth, the question is no longer whether to consider a changeof residence, but where, how, and — most importantly — with what structure. Italy has emerged as one of the most credible answers to that question. And from January 1, 2026,the rules have changed in ways that every adviser to UHNWI families needs to understand. 165,000 Millionaires relocating globally in 2026 (forecast) 3,600 Net HNWI inflows to Italy in 2025 €300K New annual flat tax for Italian non-doms 1. The 2026 Italian Non-Dom Regime: What Has Changed, What Has Not The 2026 Budget Law introduced a material amendment to Article 24-bis of the Italian Income Tax Code,the cornerstone of Italy’s special tax regime for new residents. The New Numbers – Annual substitute tax on foreign-source income raised from €200,000 to €300,000 for the principal taxpayer. – Family member surcharge doubled from €25,000 to €50,000 per qualifying family member. – Maximum duration unchanged at 15 tax periods. – Grandfathering fully preserved for individuals who established Italian tax residency before January 1, 2026. What Has Not Changed — And Why It Matters Despite the higher headline figure, the architectural integrity of the regime remains intact. This is thecritical point that international advisers should communicate to their clients. No taxation on foreign-source income beyond the lump sum, regardless of amount. Full exemption from Italian wealth taxes on foreign real estate and foreign financial assets. Full exemption from Italian inheritance and gift tax on foreign-situs assets transferred to heirs during the regime. Waiver of foreign-asset reporting obligations for assets covered by the regime. Italian-source income continues to be taxed under ordinary rules. For a family with €5 million or more of recurring foreign-source income, an annual substitute tax of€300,000 may still represent an effective burden well below the top marginal rates prevailing acrossmost of Europe. The Strategic Read Italy has not retreated from the UHNWI market. It has done the opposite: it has explicitly positioneditself in the top tier of European wealth jurisdictions, alongside Switzerland’s cantonal forfait regimesand Monaco. The price of entry has risen — but so has the political stability and durability of the framework.The increase is best read as a sign of confidence: Italy expects the demand to remain, and it has chosento monetize that demand rather than restrict it. 2. Why the Timing Matters: A Window Created by Other Jurisdictions The relative attractiveness of Italy in 2026 is not only about what Italy offers. It is also about whatother jurisdictions have stopped offering. – The United Kingdom abolished its non-dom regime effective April 6, 2025. – Portugal replaced its Non-Habitual Resident regime with a substantially diluted successor program. – Several other European jurisdictions have tightened their preferential regimes under political pressure. Italy now stands as one of the few remaining major European economies that combines a stable, codified,long-duration preferential regime with the lifestyle, cultural depth and infrastructure that UHNWI families require. 3. The Luxury Real Estate Dimension: From Investment to Strategic Reserve Capital relocating to Italy is increasingly anchored to Italian real estate — and the nature of thatanchoring has changed. Market Data – Increase in high-end property purchase inquiries year-on-year. – Average ticket size rising significantly. – Strong demand originating from abroad, particularly the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and France. – More than half of properties above €5 million transacted off-market. – Rome, Tuscany and Milan increasingly prominent among UHNWI destinations. The Logic Has Shifted Luxury Italian real estate is no longer primarily understood as a rental-yield asset. It has become acapital preservation instrument — a tangible, scarce, irreplaceable store of value within a diversifiedUHNWI portfolio. Iconic villas, historic palazzi, lakefront estates and trophy properties are increasingly held in dedicatedholding structures designed to combine asset protection, succession planning and fiscal efficiency. This is precisely the intersection where our firm operates. 4. The Adviser’s Lens: What Foreign UHNWIs Actually Need International UHNWIs relocating to or investing in Italy typically require coordinated advice across fivedomains. The first mistake families make is to address them sequentially rather than in an integrated plan. Tax Residency Planning The flat-tax regime is not automatic. It requires that the individual has not been tax-resident in Italyfor at least nine of the ten preceding tax years, and the option must be formally exercised through theannual tax return. Asset Holding Structures Trusts, foundations, holding companies and family investment vehicles each have distinct tax, successionand governance consequences in the Italian context. Their interaction with Article 24-bis requires carefulnavigation. Real Estate Acquisition Structuring Whether the acquisition vehicle should be the individual, an Italian società semplice, a domestic or foreignSPV, or a trust structure depends on the family’s intended holding horizon, the use of the property,succession plans and the residence status of beneficiaries. Succession and Generational Governance The flat-tax regime offers a highly advantageous succession environment — but only if the family wealth isproperly characterized and the governance documentation is internally consistent. Compliance and Confidentiality Italy has rigorous anti-money-laundering and beneficial-ownership disclosure regimes. Discretion isachievable within the law — but only through structures designed

Foundations, Wealth Planning

UAE Foundations: the Wealth Planning Tool Italian Clients Are Overlooking

In recent years, the United Arab Emirates have ceased to be perceived merely as a “business-friendly” jurisdiction. They are increasingly emerging as a legal laboratory of interest for international wealth planning. In this context, the UAE foundation deserves particular attention as a vehicle which, if properly structured, can offer robust governance and effective asset segregation.Since 2017, more than 2,200 foundations have been established across the three main UAE regimes — RAK ICC, ADGM and DIFC — with 848 new registrations recorded in 2025 alone. What is a UAE Foundation and how does it differ from a trust From a legal perspective, a RAK ICC foundation is a legal entity with its own separate legal personality, distinct from that of the founder and other involved parties. It is designed to hold and manage assets in accordance with the purposes set out in its charter and by-laws, within a long-term governance and succession framework. A foundation is not typically established to carry out commercial activities. The RAK ICC framework expressly provides that any such activities must be merely ancillary or incidental to its objectives. In practice, it can act as a central governance platform for family wealth, shareholdings, real estate, financial portfolios or philanthropic projects, without being confused with the underlying operating business. From an operational standpoint, the RAK ICC regime provides for: a minimum initial capital of USD 100 the appointment of a Registered Agent at least two Council Members the possibility to appoint a Guardian in certain cases a limited level of public disclosure restricted to essential registry data, with the remaining documentation kept confidential except where disclosure is required by competent authorities The 2025 RAK ICC Reforms: What Has Changed The amendments that came into force on 31 July 2025 represent a significant development. They move in the same direction as reforms already observed in the DIFC in 2024, confirming a broader trend toward convergence among UAE regimes and alignment with international private wealth planning standards. Enhanced cross-border protection (firewall provisions) RAK ICC has strengthened its firewall provisions: courts are not required to recognise or enforce foreign judgments that are inconsistent with the foundation regime. The same principle extends to founders, contributors, council members, guardians and qualified recipients. In particular, succession rights arising under foreign law in respect of assets of a living person are not recognised within the RAK ICC framework. Creditors: defined perimeter and three-year limitation period The new rules introduce a three-year limitation period to challenge the establishment of a foundation or the transfer of assets to it. More importantly, they clarify that, where claims are upheld, remedies are limited to the specific transferred asset — or its proceeds — and do not automatically affect the entire structure. This significantly improves clarity and manageability of risk exposure. Protection against coercion (duress) The amendments introduce explicit protection against requests, orders or pressures from parties acting under duress or pursuant to measures outside the competent jurisdiction. Foundation stakeholders are required to disregard demands or actions that are inconsistent with the powers conferred by the charter or by-laws. This provision reinforces the internal autonomy of the structure in distressed scenarios. Strengthened arbitration framework While RAK ICC continues to allow the choice between DIFC Courts and ADGM Courts, the 2025 reforms significantly enhance the role of arbitration. Arbitral tribunals are granted powers equivalent to those of courts in matters relating to the administration of the foundation, including representation of minors, unborn beneficiaries or unascertained persons. For complex family wealth structures, the advantage is not only procedural but also reputational. Clarification on assets held as trustee The 2025 reform further clarifies that assets held “on trust” by a foundation remain subject to the terms of the trust and do not form part of the foundation’s own assets. This is a technically important point for private trustee foundation structures. The UAE Tax Framework: Corporate Tax and Family Foundations The UAE federal tax framework has become more articulated and, in many respects, more transparent. The Federal Tax Authority has issued guidance on the taxation of Family Foundations, clarifying that a foundation may — subject to the conditions set out in Article 17(1) of the Corporate Tax Law — apply to be treated as an Unincorporated Partnership, i.e. as a fiscally transparent entity for UAE Corporate Tax purposes. If the application is approved, the foundation is not taxed at the entity level, and income, assets and liabilities are attributed to the beneficiaries in accordance with applicable rules. The main conditions include: the foundation must be established for identified or identifiable natural persons and/or public benefit entities its primary activity must consist of holding, investing, distributing or managing savings and investment assets it must not carry out activities that would constitute a commercial business if performed directly by an individual its principal purpose must not be the avoidance of Corporate Tax Foreign entities — including foundations, trusts or similar structures — with a presence or nexus in the UAE may also access the same treatment, subject to meeting the relevant requirements. The Italian Perspective: What Italian-Resident Clients Need to Consider This is the area where Italian clients must exercise particular care — and where the difference lies between a structure that is merely attractive on paper and one that is truly sustainable. Where the founder or beneficiaries of a UAE foundation are tax resident in Italy, a number of rules come into play which require an integrated analysis and cannot be overlooked: Tax monitoring (RW reporting): assets held through a foreign foundation may fall within reporting obligations, depending on the level of control and the nature of the underlying assets. IVAFE: the tax on foreign financial assets may apply, depending on how the foundation is classified under Italian law. Residence of founder and governing bodies: the location of decision-making functions may be relevant in determining the effective tax residence of the structure. Legislative Decree No. 139/2024: the recent reform of trust taxation in Italy introduces new criteria that, by analogy, may also influence the

Family Office, Uncategorized, Wealth Planning

New Guide: Family Office Guide

Today, managing a family’s wealth has become increasingly complex. It is no longer just about investments, but about coordinating people, aligning objectives, and making decisions that will shape the family’s future. This is precisely where a Family Office comes into play: providing a unified and structured approach to wealth management, with the aim of preserving, growing, and transferring assets across generations in a thoughtful and informed manner. In this guide, we explain in clear and practical terms what a Family Office is, when it becomes truly necessary, and the key benefits it can offer — from greater control and improved organization to risk mitigation and more effective governance of the relationships between family, business, and wealth. A well-designed Family Office helps prevent costly mistakes, reduces the likelihood of conflicts, and brings clarity to critical moments such as generational transitions or phases of significant growth. If you are considering how to better structure your wealth or prepare it for the future, this guide is an ideal starting point. Download the guide Should you wish to explore this further, we would be pleased to support you in designing a tailored solution that reflects the specific needs and long-term vision of your family.

Italian Citizenship 
Uncategorized

Italian Citizenship , Jure Sanguinis: Awaiting the Constitutional Court’s Decision and the Strategic Implications for International Families

A recent feature by CNN has once again brought international attention to an issue that extends well beyond immigration law: the current suspension and uncertainty surrounding recognition of Italian citizenship jure sanguinis (by right of blood). For millions of descendants of Italian emigrants — particularly in the United States, Latin America, Australia, and South Africa — Italian citizenship has historically represented far more than a symbolic reconnection with ancestral roots. It has functioned as a strategic legal status: a gateway to European Union mobility, cross-border investment opportunities, intergenerational wealth structuring, and long-term family planning within a stable legal system. Today, however, that strategic horizon is clouded by uncertainty. The 2025 Legislative Turning Point The regulatory changes introduced in 2025 marked a significant shift in Italy’s long-standing approach to citizenship by descent. Traditionally, Italy applied one of the most expansive jus sanguinis systems in Europe, allowing recognition of citizenship across multiple generations, provided the uninterrupted transmission of citizenship could be demonstrated. The 2025 restrictions effectively narrowed this scope by: -Limiting recognition primarily to first- and second-generation descendants -Introducing additional documentary and procedural requirements -Increasing scrutiny over lineage continuity and registration formalities In practical terms, these changes have halted or complicated thousands of pending and prospective applications from descendants of more remote Italian ancestors. For many families abroad, the Italian passport was not merely an identity document. It was a mobility instrument within the EU, a hedge against geopolitical risk, and, in some cases, a component of broader estate and tax planning strategies. The Constitutional Court Hearing: 11 March 2026 The central question now lies before the Italian Constitutional Court (Corte Costituzionale), with a hearing scheduled for 11 March 2026. The Court is called upon to evaluate the constitutional legitimacy of the 2025 restrictions. The outcome could follow one of two primary directions: -Reopening the broader jure sanguinis framework, reaffirming Italy’s historical principle of intergenerational transmission without generational limits; or -Upholding the restrictive regime, consolidating a more contained and policy-driven interpretation of citizenship rights. The ruling will not merely clarify procedural rules. It will determine whether Italian citizenship remains a historically grounded right or becomes a more selective, policy-managed entitlement. Why This Matters Beyond Immigration From a professional perspective — advising families between Italy and international jurisdictions — the implications are structural. Legal certainty is the cornerstone of cross-border planning. Decisions regarding: -Relocation to Italy or another EU Member State -Acquisition of European real estate -Structuring of trusts or holding entities -Intergenerational succession planning -Long-term tax residency strategies are all influenced by the availability (or absence) of EU citizenship. Many international families have placed relocation projects, asset acquisitions, and restructuring initiatives on hold pending legal clarity. Citizenship status can affect not only mobility rights but also: -Access to preferential tax regimes -Inheritance and succession planning within the EU framework -Banking and financial structuring across European jurisdictions -Education and healthcare access for future generations In short, citizenship is often embedded in broader wealth management architecture. A Shift in Italy’s Identity? Historically, Italy has distinguished itself by maintaining a strong bond with its diaspora, recognizing the millions who emigrated during the 19th and 20th centuries and preserving citizenship transmission as a matter of cultural continuity. The 2025 reforms suggest a potential realignment toward models adopted by other European countries, where citizenship by descent is more tightly circumscribed. The Constitutional Court’s decision will signal whether Italy intends to preserve its expansive diaspora- oriented identity or move toward a more restrictive, demographic-policy-driven framework. A Prudent Approach in the Interim Until the 11 March 2026 hearing, prudence remains essential. For descendants currently evaluating citizenship applications or planning relocation, a structured approach is advisable: -Closely monitor constitutional developments -Conduct a preliminary assessment of lineage eligibility under both current and potential post-ruling scenarios -Avoid irreversible relocation or asset decisions based solely on anticipated outcomes -Integrate citizenship strategy into broader tax and estate planning frameworks In cross-border planning, timing and legal stability are critical variables. Acting prematurely can create unnecessary exposure; waiting without preparation can mean missed opportunities. Conclusion The forthcoming Constitutional Court ruling will likely represent a defining moment in the evolution of Italian citizenship law. For international families of Italian descent, the issue is not only emotional or symbolic. It is strategic. Whether Italy reaffirms its historic openness or consolidates a more restrictive approach will shape mobility options, investment decisions, and intergenerational planning structures for years to come. In the meantime, informed vigilance — rather than reactive decision-making — remains the most responsible course of action. Paolo Gaeta Paolo Gaeta & Associati

Trusts and loss
Uncategorized

Trusts and loss of capacity: a global challenge and a necessary response in fiduciary governance

Loss of capacity as a new systemic risk in trust structures  The loss of mental capacity is today one of the most delicate – and yet still insufficiently addressed – issues in wealth planning through trusts.  The increasing prevalence of dementia and other forms of cognitive vulnerability makes this risk ever more tangible. Where fiduciaries and advisers fail to consider such scenarios from the very inception of the trust, incapacity may become a destabilising legal variable, capable of undermining the entire fiduciary framework.  A global problem without uniform standards  Loss of capacity represents one of the principal areas of uncertainty within international trust structures. In many jurisdictions, clear legal rules are lacking as to what occurs when a central actor – whether the settlor, trustee, or holder of reserved powers – is no longer able to properly exercise their role.  Legislative gaps emerge sharply when considering comparative experiences across legal systems.  In Chile, for instance, civil law continues to rely on a model of total interdiction: once incapacity is declared, the individual is entirely deprived of legal capacity. Proceedings may take up to two years, often resulting in the freezing of assets and a significant increase in legal and financial burdens for families.  In China, the opposite difficulty may arise, as the individual may remain legally capable throughout judicial proceedings, even when factual incapacity has already begun to compromise trust-related decision-making.  In the Middle East, the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC), despite having trust legislation grounded in common law principles, lacks an express statutory definition of mental capacity. The matter is addressed more extensively under UAE civil procedure law, where incapacity triggers guardianship proceedings and where powers of attorney automatically lapse, without mechanisms equivalent to enduring powers of attorney in Anglo-Saxon jurisdictions.  Even in well-established trust jurisdictions such as the Cayman Islands, definitional uncertainty persists. Incapacity has recently been characterised as a question of fact, determined at the time of the relevant decision and assessed in relation to the specific act at issue. This confirms that capacity is not an absolute status, but rather a contextual condition evaluated in light of the particular circumstances.  Recognising incapacity: a practical and relational challenge  Attention must therefore shift to the internal governance of the trust.  Loss of capacity must be addressed proactively, as early warning signs may easily remain concealed, particularly in an era where communication increasingly takes place via e-mail and text messages. By contrast, changes are often far more evident during in-person meetings or telephone conversations.  Vulnerability beyond ageing  Incapacity is not solely linked to advanced age. It may also arise in situations involving substance abuse, bereavement, divorce, family coercion, or other circumstances of vulnerability.  Maintaining a close connection not only with the settlor, but also with the broader family context, may assist trustees in identifying behavioural anomalies and emerging red flags before they become irreversible.  The settlor and reserved powers: the most critical point  One of the most sensitive aspects concerns the extremely common situations in which the settlor retains a direct role within the trust structure, whether as protector or through the reservation of significant powers, such as the appointment and removal of trustees or investment decision-making authority.  In such circumstances, full mental capacity becomes an essential element to monitor. Should the settlor make decisions detrimental to the trust, trustees may face exposure to claims alleging breach of fiduciary duty.  Family disputes and generational transition  Loss of capacity often produces disruptive familial consequences.  As the central family figure loses authority, disputes, tensions and power struggles may emerge. In this context, trustees may play a valuable role as independent third parties, facilitating communication and promoting a pragmatic approach that reduces the risk of irreparable deterioration in family relationships.  Documentary governance as the primary response  The most effective solution remains careful planning.  The optimal moment to address incapacity is during the drafting of the trust instrument itself, by providing:  -clear criteria for determining loss of capacity  -procedures for the automatic cessation of roles upon incapacity  -mechanisms for the orderly replacement of power-holders  -continuity of administration, ensuring the trust is not paralysed  Planning for incapacity in the trust deed  It is advisable to incorporate express provisions regulating the assessment of incapacity, for example by referring such determination to:  -a competent court ruling  -a medical certificate issued by a qualified physician  -an independent third-party evaluation  Trust structures should also ensure that trustees may continue to exercise their powers without dependence upon the consent of an incapacitated individual, thereby safeguarding both the trust assets and administrative continuity.  Conclusion: we cannot wait until incapacity strikes  Loss of mental capacity is among the most pressing contemporary challenges in trust law, one destined to intensify with ageing populations and the expansion of cross-border wealth structures.  While careful drafting cannot eliminate the complexity of incapacity, it can significantly mitigate practical disruption and litigation risk, preserving the trust’s effectiveness even in moments of profound fragility.   Chiara Pascale  Paolo Gaeta & Associati

Scroll to Top